Parrot News Reports

(BREITBART Real News) (Rush Limbaugh Real News) (Michelle Malkin) (Parrot News Reports Real News) (DRUDGE, WND, BBC, CNET, NYT, INFOWARS, Foxnews, Reuters, AP) Accurate analysis based on accurate facts is the key to real news. They report and you decide based on their analysis and yours. Make sure the analysis is accurate based on the facts. Don't just "parrot" ie repeat what you hear without knowing if its true!  (Compare liberal news state run media with  the Real News at

Go to And enter this code  59VJJLG  to add Harbour Light Radio Channel.  

Harbour Light Radio features 24/7 streaming of Christian Radio and 5 conservative talk radio stations:   WORD | Alex Jones/Info Wars | KJCE | KMBC | KNSS

Real News Alert REAL NEWS ALERT:  The REAL news is this:

President Trump is making America great again and the liberal news media continues to produce FAKE news, twisted news. Members of congress take the FAKE news and promote their own agenda and try to make President Trump something that he is not. When you have so much FAKE news and the enemy within, (employees in the government loyal to obama/DNC in the FBI, CIA etc.) you get a continuous barrage of FAKE NEWS that confuses the public.

The liberal news media has produced a white guilt phobia that they use to control you through political correctness. Political correctness is not rational and is a phobia minipulated by the liberal news media to cause civil unrest. Liberal news media use other manufactured phobias to control people also. Don't be controlled by various phobias of the liberal news media. Don't believe their FAKE news reports. Be an independant thinker not a person controlled by liberal news media.    Parrot News Reports    (Analysis And Opinion Blog) 

Parrot News Reports RSS Feed Link   (RSS News Feeds)

(National News, Sports News, Creation News, Sport Hunting News, Survival News, Medical Health News, Tech News, Recipes News, Antiques News)

Parrot News Reports      (Page 1)    (BREITBART Real News)  (Rush Limbaugh Real News) (DRUDGE) (WND Real News)  (Fox News)  (INFOWARS)   {Reuters, AP, NYT}

Sports News (ESPN)    (Page 2)    (ESPN NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, RPM, Soccer, College Basketball, Football)

Creation News Report  (Page 3)     (   ( Days Of Praise Daily Devotionals)

Sport Hunting News     (Page 4)      (Hunting News, Water Fowl, Turkey, Predator, Fishing, Deer, Archery)

Survival News Report  (Page 5)      (General Survival, Preparedness, Survival Medicine, Survival Topics)

Medical Health Report  (Page 6)     (Quit Smoking, Allergy, COPD, Lupus, Stroke, Fitness, Nutrition, Asthma)

Sports Odds Report     (Page 7)     (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, UFC, NCAA Odds And Point Spreads)

Tech Crunch News      (Page 8)     (Tech Crunch profiles companies, products and events defining the web.)

Simply Recipes News  (Page 9)     (Family cooking and food info with hundreds of healthy whole-food recipes.)

Antiques / Collectable News  (Page 10)    (Antiques And Collectable News.)

rss feed widget 


Analysis And Opinion Blog     Get RSS Feed Here   (Over 100 FREE Online Calculators)

rss feed widget  (News Talk Station)

rss feed widget (Real Climate Change News)
RSS Feed Widget

RSS Feed Widget

RSS Feed Widget  (FineTunedUniverse)

rss feed widget 

RSS Feed Widget

Financial Times News

Bob Mclain Podcasts 

News images can be deceiving , what you see is not always indicative of the real story. This applies not only to images, but to news stories as well. What you read and/or see is not the entire event, but rather a version of the event that often contains various forms of bias.

The most common ways that bias manifests itself in the news are through world view, word choice, omissions, the limiting of debate, framing of the story, and a biased selection and use of sources.

Sources are important! You cannot always trust information from all sources.

There are four main influences that cause bias to apper in the news, and these are geography, ideology, institutional affiliations, and the nature of the medium. While all these influences do not necessarily affect every piece, most reporting is affected by at least one or two of these influences.

There are two major aspects of Institutional Affiliations that influence a media sources' reporting of the news: Economic Affiliations and Political Affiliations. If a media source has strong economic ties to a particular business entity these ties may play a big part in what news we actually see and how this news is revealed. Similiarly, strong Political Affliations (e.g., liberal or conservative) within a media source can influence the type of news and the angle in which this news is depicted.

For example if you're watching the regular 30-minute evening news program on your favorite TV channel, do you expect to get the same amount of information that you would get from reading the New York Times? While you might expect that the stories found on the front page of the Times would be covered fully in the evening news program, this is often not the case. The medium in which the news is presented directly influences how much information can be presented to the audience whether they are readers, listeners, or viewers. Therefore, the medium in which the news is presented has the potential to affect the way in which the audience interprets the events being described.

My advice is if you want the nitty gritty nuts and bolts of the news don't rely on the "national state run media" and their talking points.

Every news source you watch or listen to must be considered carefully including (Parrot News Reports) analysis and commentary.

For example: It was widely reported that the "Hands up, don't shoot", or simply "hands up", slogan and gesture originaed after the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed African-American in Ferguson, Missouri, during a confrontation with a Caucasian police officer.

This phrase became a rallying cry for Ferguson residents, who took to the streets to protest the fatal shooting of a black 18-year-old by a white police officer, Darren Wilson. Witness accounts spread after the shooting that Brown had his hands raised in surrender, mouthing the words “Don’t shoot” as his last words before being shot execution-style. The gesture of raised hands became a symbol of outrage over mistreatment of unarmed black youth by police.

That narrative was called into question when a St. Louis County grand jury could not confirm those testimonies. And a recently released Department of Justice investigative report concluded the same.

Yet the gesture continues to be used today.

Lets set the record straight on the DOJ’s findings, especially after The Washington Post’s opinion writer Jonathan Capehart wrote that it was “built on a lie.”

“Hands up, don’t shoot” links directly to Brown’s death, and it went viral. After the shooting, St. Louis Rams players raised their hands as a symbolic gesture entering the field before a football game. Protesters chanted “Hands up, don’t shoot” during rallies after a grand jury in the state’s case against Wilson decided not to indict Wilson in Brown’s killing. The phrase and gesture were on signs, T-shirts, hashtags, memes and magazine covers.

In November 2014, a grand jury decided not to indict Wilson after finding that witness reports did not match up with evidence. Other witnesses recanted their original accounts or changed them, calling their veracity into question. In particular, the grand jury could not confirm the “Hands up, don’t shoot” narrative the way it was told after the shooting. By then, however, the phrase had taken on a message of its own.

On Dec. 1, 2014, four members of the Congressional Black Caucus repeated the gesture while delivering speeches on the House Floor titled, “Black in America: What Ferguson Says About Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.” Each of the members held up their hands, and the image spread widely online.

Yet the Department of Justice’s March 4, 2015, investigative report (PDF 86 Pages) on the shooting of Michael Brown found federal investigators could not confirm witness accounts that Brown signaled surrender before being killed execution-style. The department’s descriptions of about 40 witness testimonies show the original claims that Brown had his hands up were not accurate.

Some witnesses who claimed they saw Brown’s hands raised had testimonies that were inconsistent with physical and forensic evidence. Some admitted to federal investigators they felt pressured to retell the narrative that was being spread after Brown’s shooting. Others recanted their initial testimonies saying they had heard it through media reports or via social media. A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?” Others said Brown’s hands were not raised, as he was charging at Wilson. A few said Brown’s hands were “balled up.”

Investigators narrowed down the “hands up” claim to a witness – Witness 128 – who had told his family and neighbors his inaccurate version of events as crowds gathered minutes and hours after the shooting, the report says. Another witness could not confirm what she saw because of her poor vision, but she heard a man running around the apartments along the street where Wilson shot Brown. The man was saying something to the effect of, “The police shot my friend and his hands were up.” The witness said that “quickly became the narrative on the street, and to her frustration, people used it both as an excuse to riot and to create a ‘block party’ atmosphere.”

A key passage from the report:

Investigators tracked down several individuals who, via the aforementioned media, claimed to have witnessed Wilson shooting Brown as Brown held his hands up in clear surrender. All of these purported witnesses, upon being interviewed by law enforcement, acknowledged that they did not actually witness the shooting, but rather repeated what others told them in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. … Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. In contrast, Wilson’s account of Brown’s actions, if true, would establish that the shootings were not objectively unreasonable under the relevant Constitutional standards governing an officer’s use of deadly force.

Every news source you watch or listen to must be considered carefully. The news media can and does TWIST the news as fact. The “Hands up, don’t shoot” phrase was never spoken by Brown nor did he raise his hands to signal surrender. The "witnesses" did NOT actually see the shooting! They just repeated what others had told them just after the shooting.

This is a prime example of what people do and what the "national state run news" and local media does.

People are interviewed and tell a story. The story they tell may or may not be factual depending on how creditable the person is.

If the person telling the story is getting it second hand its NOT CREDITABLE until it is confirmed and documented!

The news today is little more than gossip told to another person without any real knowledge of what has happened.

If you DO NOT want to watch or listen to FAKE news and want to hear the real news as much as possible click on the links below:

(1)   (Real News)  (Breitbart will be overtaking foxnews ratings in the near future. Foxnews knows the future and it is  That why all of a sudden they are starting to report on Breitbart news articles.)

(2)  Rush Limbaugh   (Real News)

(3)  WORD Radio (The Upstate's Talk Station)

(4) Drudge Report

(5) World Net Daily (

(6) (Alex Jones)

Research the news and don't believe everything you read. Check it out carefully. It takes effort on your part. If you just repeat the news like a parrot without really knowing the facts your just repeating gossip like "hands up don't shoot or hands up". A lie reported by local and national "news media".

The state run news media is like a parrot that just repeats what it hears.

If you are going to act like a parrot and repeat something be sure to carefully check out the facts from several sources before you "polly want a cracker".

If your "news source" is a friend, relative, neighbor, stranger, billboard, magazine, newspaper, tv, talk radio etc don't just repeat what you hear like a gossip parrot.

Breaking news is knee jerk news most of the time and is like parrot news.

The "state run national news media" are counting on you to just parrot their propaganda/talking points without ever checking out the content of your "polly want a cracker" comments! The local parrot news media are also joined at the hip with the national networks.

BREITBART Real News, Breitbart, rush limbaugh, news, citizen journalist, national news, international news, BBC News, Fox News, Reuters News, Newyork Times News, CNET News, Financial Times News, breaking news, news storys, anycalculator news, REUTERS News, NYT News, CNET News, Financial Times News, polly want a cracker, local parrot news media, national parrot news, state run national news media

Editors note:

Congress does not write laws but lobbists do. They control congress. The 2017 budget bill gives the democrats everything they wanted. A big mistake for Trump.

Google boss: We will 'work to fix' fake news

16 November 2016 Last updated at 13:48 GMT

Google's chief executive Sundar Pichai, says it is important it and other social media businesses promote "accurate" stories to their billions of users.

Talking to the BBC's Economics editor Kamal Ahmed in the wake of fake news controversies during the US election campaign, Mr Pichai said the firm had made some mistakes.

"There have been a couple of incidences where... we didn't get it right," he said. "It is a learning moment for us and we will definitely work to fix it."

Editors Note:

Google announced that it would be working harder to stop "fake news" but what do they consider is FAKE news?.

Is Google is in the business to cull the news and provide the public with selected news stories?  (I thought it was a search engine not an editor.)

Should Google decide what is consided "fake news"?

Google controls the news when people search their index. Sometimes you can find hidden deep inside google searches about what you are looking for but it takes time and effort. This is not what freedom of speech should be.

Liberal/socialist newspapers put certain news stories deep inside their paper where they are hard to find and sometimes just a sentence or two that references the real story. This should not be the same in any major search engine.

Google controls their search index to target you with certain ads when you visit websites. Now they will also control the news.

Google has stated that they will begin in Jan 2017 to determine what is real news and fake news. Google should Not filter the news. They should let you decide what you want to read, see and hear.  doesn't filter the news and limit your ability to choose what to read when you want to.

Use  as your search engine. will not filter out news sites like other top search engines just because they conclude such sites are fake news. Fake news to top search engines means filtering out anything they don't want you to see. FAKE news search engines want to control the news, does not.

Use to get search results that you may not find in other search engine indexes. Over 50% of Americans now get their news from social media outlets which promote and parrot FAKE news. Major search engines which are part of the FAKE news media, know people are getting more aware of their deception that modifies search results.  Use  as your search engine instead. It doesn't modify your search results.